The Rundown on Aerodynamics
It’s unpleasant to think about, but imagine what would happen if you drove your car into a brick wall at 65 miles per hour (104.6 kilometers per hour). Metal would twist and tear. Glass would shatter. Airbags would burst forth to protect you. But even with all the advancements in safety we have on our modern automobiles, this would likely be a tough accident to walk away from. A car simply isn’t designed to go through a brick wall.
But there is another type of “wall” that cars are designed to move through, and have been for a long time — the wall of air that pushes against a vehicle at high speeds.
Most of us don’t think of air or wind as a wall. At low speeds and on days when it’s not very windy outside, it’s hard to notice the way air interacts with our vehicles. But at high speeds, and on exceptionally windy days, air resistance has a tremendous effect on the way a car accelerates, handles and achieves fuel mileage.
This is where the science of aerodynamics comes into play. Aerodynamics is the study of forces and the resulting motion of objects through the air. For several decades, cars have been designed with aerodynamics in mind, and carmakers have come up with a variety of innovations that make cutting through that “wall” of air easier and less of an impact on daily driving.
Essentially, having a car designed with airflow in mind means it has less difficulty accelerating and can achieve better fuel economy numbers because the engine doesn’t have to work nearly as hard to push the car through the wall of air.
Engineers have developed several ways of doing this. For instance, more rounded designs and shapes on the exterior of the vehicle are crafted to channel air in a way so that it flows around the car with the least resistance possible. Some high-performance cars even have parts that move air smoothly across the underside of the car (much more on that later). Many also include a spoiler and rear wing to keep the air from lifting the car’s wheels and making it unstable at high speeds. Although, as you’ll read later, most of the spoilers / wings that you see on cars are simply for decoration more than anything else.
In this article, we’ll look at the physics of aerodynamics and air resistance, the history of how cars have been designed with these factors in mind and how with the trend toward “greener” cars, aerodynamics is now more important than ever.
The Science of Aerodynamics
Aerodynamics is part of a branch of physics called fluid dynamics, which is all about studying liquids and gases that are moving. Although it can involve very complex math, the basic principles are relatively easy-to-understand; they include how fluids flow in different ways, what causes drag (fluid resistance), and how fluids conserve their volume and energy as they flow. Another important idea is that when an object moves through a stationary fluid, the science is pretty much the same as if the fluid moved and the object were still. That’s why it’s possible to study the aerodynamic performance of a car or an airplane in a wind tunnel: blasting high-speed air around a still model of a plane or car is the same as flying or driving through the air at the same speed.
Laminar and turbulent flow
When you empty water from a plastic bottle, you’ve probably noticed you can do it in two very different ways. If you tip the bottle at a shallow angle, the water comes out very smoothly; air moves past it, in the opposite direction, filling the bottle with “emptiness.” If you tip the bottle more, or hold it vertically, the water comes out noisily, in jerks; that’s because the air and the water have to fight at the neck of the bottle. Sometimes the water wins and rushes out, sometimes the air wins and rushes in, briefly stopping the water flow. The fight between water exiting and air entering gives you the characteristic “glug-glug” sound as you pour.
Pour water slowly from a bottle and you get smooth, laminar flow. Tip the bottle up more and the flow will become turbulent. Also, can you see how the spout of water dripping down from this bottle gets narrower toward the bottom where the water moves faster (after being accelerated by gravity)? That’s an example of fluid continuity, which is explained below.
What we see here are the two extreme types of fluid flow. In the first case, we have the water and the air sliding very smoothly past one another in layers, which is called laminar flow (or streamline flow because the fluid flows in parallel lines called streamlines). In the second case, the air and water move in a more erratic way, which we called turbulent flow. If we’re trying to design something like a sports car, ideally we want to shape the body so the flow of air around it is as smooth as possible—so it’s laminar rather than turbulent. The more turbulence there is, the more air resistance the car will experience, the more energy it will waste, and the slower it will go.
Boundary layer
The speed at which a fluid flows past an object varies according to how far from the object you are. If you’re sitting in a parked car and a gale-force wind is howling past you at 200km/h (125mph), you might think the difference in speed between the air and the car is 200km/h—and it is! But there’s not a sudden, drastic discontinuity between the stationary car and the fast-moving air. Right next to the car, the air speed is actually zero: the air sticks to the car because there are attractive forces between the molecules of the car’s paintwork and the air molecules that touch them. The further away from the car you get, the higher the wind speed. A certain distance from the car, the air will be traveling at its full speed of 200km/h. The region surrounding the car where the air speed increases from zero to its maximum is known as the boundary layer. We get laminar flow when the fluid can flow efficiently, gently and smoothly increasing in speed across the boundary layer; we get turbulent flown when this doesn’t happen—when the fluid jumbles and mixes up chaotically instead of sliding past itself in smooth layers.
Wind speed increases with distance from the ground. In theory, a wind turbine tower has to be high enough to ensure the rotors are operating outside the boundary layer. In practice, turbine designers have to compromise: very high turbines may be unacceptable for all kinds of environmental and safety reasons.
The idea of the boundary layer leads to all kinds of interesting things. It explains why, for example, your car can be dusty and dirty even though it’s racing through the air at high speed. Although it’s traveling fast, the air right next to the paintwork isn’t moving at all, so particles of dirt aren’t blown away as you might expect them to be. The same applies when you try to blow the dust off a bookshelf. You can blow really hard, but you’ll never blow all the dust away: at best, you just blow the dust (the upper layers of dust particles) off the dust (the lower layers that stay stuck to the shelf)! The boundary layer concept also explains why wind turbines have to be so high. The closer to the ground you are, the lower the wind speed: at ground level, on something like concrete, the wind speed is actually zero. Build a wind turbine that’s way up in the sky and you’re (hopefully) reaching beyond the boundary layer to the place where the air speed is a maximum and the wind has higher kinetic energy to drive the turbine’s rotors.
Even More Science of Aerodynamics
Before we look at how aerodynamics is applied to automobiles, here’s a little physics refresher course so that you can understand the basic idea.
As an object moves through the atmosphere, it displaces the air that surrounds it. The object is also subjected to gravity and drag. Drag is generated when a solid object moves through a fluid medium such as water or air. Drag increases with velocity: the faster the object travels, the more drag it experiences.
We measure an object’s motion using the factors described in Newton’s laws. These include mass, velocity, weight, external force, and acceleration.
Drag has a direct effect on acceleration. The acceleration (a) of an object is its weight (W) minus drag (D) divided by its mass (m). Remember, weight is an object’s mass times the force of gravity acting on it. Your weight would change on the moon because of lesser gravity, but your mass stays the same. To put it more simply:
a = (W – D) / m
As an object accelerates, its velocity and drag increase, eventually to the point where drag becomes equal to weight; in which case no further acceleration can occur. Let’s say our object in this equation is a car. This means that as the car travels faster and faster, more and more air pushes against it, limiting how much more it can accelerate and restricting it to a certain speed.
How does all of this apply to car design? Well, it’s useful for figuring out an important number: drag coefficient. This is one of the primary factors that determine how easily an object moves through the air. The drag coefficient (Cd) is equal to the drag (D), divided by the quantity of the density (r), times half the velocity (V) squared times the area (A). To make that more readable:
Cd = D / (A * .5 * r * V^2)
So realistically, how much drag coefficient does a car designer aim for if they’re crafting a car with aerodynamic intent?
The Coefficient of Drag
We’ve just learned that the coefficient of drag (Cd) is a figure that measures the force of air resistance on an object, such as a car. Now, imagine the force of air pushing against the car as it moves down the road. At 70 miles per hour (112.7 kilometers per hour), there’s four times more force working against the car than at 35 miles per hour (56.3 kilometers per hour).
The aerodynamic abilities of a car are measured using the vehicle’s coefficient of drag. Essentially, the lower the Cd, the more aerodynamic a car is, and the easier it can move through the wall of air pushing against it.
Let’s look at a few Cd numbers. Remember the boxy old Volvo cars of the 1970s and ’80s? An old Volvo 960 sedan achieves a Cd of .36. The newer Volvos are much more sleek and curvy, and an S80 sedan achieves a Cd of .28. This proves something that you may have been able to guess already — smoother, more streamlined shapes are more aerodynamic than boxy ones. Why is that exactly?
Let’s look at the most aerodynamic thing in nature: a teardrop. The teardrop is smooth and round on all sides and tapers off at the top. Air flows around it smoothly as it falls to the ground. It’s the same with cars; smooth, rounded surfaces allow the air to flow in a stream over the vehicle, reducing the “push” of air against the body.
Today, most cars achieve a Cd of about .30. SUVs, which tend to be more boxy than cars because they’re larger, accommodate more people, and often need bigger grilles to help cool the engine down, have a Cd of anywhere from .30 to .40 or more. Pickup trucks, a purposefully boxy design, typically get around .40.
Many have questioned the “unique” looks of the Toyota Prius hybrid, but it has an extremely aerodynamic shape for a good reason. Among other efficient characteristics, its Cd of .26 helps it achieve very high mileage. In fact, reducing the Cd of a car by just 0.01 can result in a 0.2 miles per gallon (.09 kilometers per liter) increase in fuel economy.
Measuring Drag Using Wind Tunnels
To measure the aerodynamic effectiveness of a car in real time, engineers have borrowed a tool from the aircraft industry: the wind tunnel.
In essence, a wind tunnel is a massive tube with fans that produce airflow over an object inside. This can be a car, an airplane, or anything else that engineers need to measure for air resistance. From a room behind the tunnel, engineers study the way the air interacts with the object, the way the air currents flow over the various surfaces.
The car or plane inside never moves, but the fans create wind at different speeds to simulate real-world conditions. Sometimes a real car won’t even be used — designers often rely on exact scale models of their vehicles to measure wind resistance. As wind moves over the car in the tunnel, computers are used to calculate the drag coefficient (Cd).
Wind tunnels are really nothing new. They’ve been around since the late 1800s to measure airflow over many early aircraft attempts. Even the Wright Brothers had one. After World War II, racecar engineers seeking an edge over the competition began to use them to gauge the effectiveness of their cars’ aerodynamic equipment. That technology later made its way to passenger cars and trucks.
However, in recent years, the big, multi-million-dollar wind tunnels are being used less and less. Computer simulations are starting to replace wind tunnels as the best way to measure the aerodynamics of a car or aircraft. In many cases, wind tunnels are mostly just called upon to make sure the computer simulations are accurate.
Many think that adding a spoiler or wing on the back of a car is a great way to make it more aerodynamic. This is application specific.
Aerodynamic Add-ons
There’s more to aerodynamics than just drag, there are other factors called lift and downforce, too. Lift is the force that opposes the weight of an object and raises it into the air and keeps it there. Downforce is the opposite of lift, the force that presses an object in the direction of the ground.
You may think that the drag coefficient on a Formula One car would be very low; a super-aerodynamic car is faster, right? Not in this case. A typical F1 car has a Cd of about .70.
Why is this type of racecar able to drive at speeds of more than 200 miles an hour (321.9 kilometers per hour), yet not as aerodynamic as you might have guessed? That’s because Formula One cars are built to generate as much downforce as possible. At the speeds they’re traveling, and with their extremely light weight, these cars actually begin to experience lift at some speeds, physics forces them to take off like an airplane. Obviously, cars aren’t intended to fly through the air, and if a car goes airborne it could mean a devastating crash. For this reason, downforce must be maximized to keep the car on the ground at high speeds, and this means a high Cd is required.
Formula One cars achieve this by using wings or spoilers mounted onto the front and rear of the vehicle. These wings channel the flow into currents of air that press the car to the ground: better known as downforce. This maximizes cornering speed, but it has to be carefully balanced with lift to also allow the car the appropriate amount of straight-line speed.
Lots of production cars include aerodynamic add-ons to generate downforce. While the Nissan GT-R has been somewhat criticized in the automotive press for its looks, the entire body is designed to channel air over the car and back through the oval-shaped rear spoiler, generating plenty of downforce. Ferrari’s 599 GTB Fiorano has flying buttress B-pillars designed to channel air to the rear as well — these help to reduce drag.
But you see plenty of spoilers and wings on everyday cars, like Honda and Toyota sedans. Do those really add an aerodynamic benefit to a car? In some cases, it can add a little high-speed stability. For example, the original Audi TT didn’t have a spoiler on its rear decklid, but Audi added one after its rounded body was found to create too much lift and was a factor in a few wrecks.
In most cases, however, bolting a big spoiler or wing on the back of an ordinary car isn’t going to aid in performance, speed, or handling a whole lot… if at all. In some cases, it could even create more understeer, or reluctance to corner. However, if you think that giant spoiler looks great on the trunk of your Honda Civic, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. To each their own.